Major Features Added: - Complete token bucket rate limiting for IRC commands and web interface - Per-user rate tracking with category-based limits (Basic, Gameplay, Management, Admin, Web) - Admin commands for rate limit management (\!rate_stats, \!rate_user, \!rate_unban, \!rate_reset) - Automatic violation tracking and temporary bans with cleanup - Global item spawn multiplier system with 75% spawn rate reduction - Central admin configuration system (config.py) - One-command bot startup script (start_petbot.sh) Rate Limiting: - Token bucket algorithm with burst capacity and refill rates - Category limits: Basic (20/min), Gameplay (10/min), Management (5/min), Web (60/min) - Graceful violation handling with user-friendly error messages - Admin exemption and override capabilities - Background cleanup of old violations and expired bans Item Spawn System: - Added global_spawn_multiplier to config/items.json for easy adjustment - Reduced all individual spawn rates by 75% (multiplied by 0.25) - Admins can fine-tune both global multiplier and individual item rates - Game engine integration applies multiplier to all spawn calculations Infrastructure: - Single admin user configuration in config.py - Enhanced startup script with dependency management and verification - Updated documentation and help system with rate limiting guide - Comprehensive test suite for rate limiting functionality Security: - Rate limiting protects against command spam and abuse - IP-based tracking for web interface requests - Proper error handling and status codes (429 for rate limits) 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
264 lines
No EOL
10 KiB
Text
264 lines
No EOL
10 KiB
Text
PETBOT SECURITY AUDIT - ISSUES REPORT
|
|
=====================================
|
|
|
|
Generated: 2025-01-15
|
|
Auditor: Claude Code Assistant
|
|
Scope: Complete security audit of PetBot IRC bot and web interface
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
|
|
================
|
|
This security audit identified 23 distinct security vulnerabilities across the PetBot application, ranging from critical to low severity. The most concerning issues are Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the web interface, missing security headers, and inadequate access controls.
|
|
|
|
CRITICAL VULNERABILITIES (5 issues)
|
|
===================================
|
|
|
|
1. CRITICAL: XSS - Direct nickname injection in HTML output
|
|
File: webserver.py (lines 1191-1193)
|
|
Impact: Arbitrary JavaScript execution
|
|
Description: Player nicknames are directly inserted into HTML without escaping
|
|
Example: nickname = '"><script>alert("XSS")</script>'
|
|
Recommendation: Implement HTML escaping for all user output
|
|
|
|
2. CRITICAL: XSS - Page title injection
|
|
File: webserver.py (lines 2758, 2842, 4608)
|
|
Impact: JavaScript execution in page titles
|
|
Description: Nicknames inserted directly into <title> tags
|
|
Recommendation: Escape all dynamic content in page titles
|
|
|
|
3. CRITICAL: Missing HTTP security headers
|
|
File: webserver.py (entire file)
|
|
Impact: XSS, clickjacking, MIME sniffing attacks
|
|
Description: No CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options headers
|
|
Recommendation: Add security headers to all responses
|
|
|
|
4. CRITICAL: No HTTPS configuration
|
|
File: webserver.py (line 4773)
|
|
Impact: Data transmitted in plaintext
|
|
Description: Server runs HTTP only, no SSL/TLS
|
|
Recommendation: Implement HTTPS with valid certificates
|
|
|
|
5. CRITICAL: No web interface authentication
|
|
File: webserver.py (lines 564-588)
|
|
Impact: Unauthorized access to all player data
|
|
Description: Any user can access any player's profile via URL manipulation
|
|
Recommendation: Implement proper authentication and authorization
|
|
|
|
HIGH SEVERITY VULNERABILITIES (8 issues)
|
|
========================================
|
|
|
|
6. HIGH: XSS - Pet data injection
|
|
File: webserver.py (lines 2139-2154)
|
|
Impact: JavaScript execution through pet names
|
|
Description: Pet nicknames and species names inserted without escaping
|
|
Recommendation: Escape all pet data before HTML output
|
|
|
|
7. HIGH: XSS - Achievement data injection
|
|
File: webserver.py (lines 2167-2175)
|
|
Impact: JavaScript execution through achievement data
|
|
Description: Achievement names and descriptions not escaped
|
|
Recommendation: Escape achievement data in HTML output
|
|
|
|
8. HIGH: XSS - Inventory item injection
|
|
File: webserver.py (lines 2207-2214)
|
|
Impact: JavaScript execution through item data
|
|
Description: Item names and descriptions inserted without escaping
|
|
Recommendation: Escape all item data before HTML output
|
|
|
|
9. HIGH: Path traversal vulnerability
|
|
File: webserver.py (lines 564-565, 573-574, 584-585, 587-588)
|
|
Impact: Access to unauthorized resources
|
|
Description: Direct path extraction without validation
|
|
Example: /player/../../../etc/passwd
|
|
Recommendation: Implement path validation and sanitization
|
|
|
|
10. HIGH: SQL injection in reset script
|
|
File: reset_players.py (lines 57, 63)
|
|
Impact: Arbitrary SQL execution
|
|
Description: F-string interpolation in SQL queries
|
|
Recommendation: Use parameterized queries or validate table names
|
|
|
|
11. HIGH: Input validation gaps
|
|
File: Multiple modules
|
|
Impact: Various injection attacks
|
|
Description: Inconsistent input validation across modules
|
|
Recommendation: Implement comprehensive input validation
|
|
|
|
12. HIGH: Admin authentication bypass
|
|
File: admin.py (line 18), backup_commands.py (line 58)
|
|
Impact: Unauthorized admin access
|
|
Description: Hard-coded admin checks vulnerable to IRC spoofing
|
|
Recommendation: Implement secure admin authentication
|
|
|
|
13. HIGH: Information disclosure in error messages
|
|
File: webserver.py (lines 1111, 1331, 1643, 1872)
|
|
Impact: System information leakage
|
|
Description: Detailed error messages expose internal structure
|
|
Recommendation: Implement generic error messages for users
|
|
|
|
MEDIUM SEVERITY VULNERABILITIES (7 issues)
|
|
==========================================
|
|
|
|
14. MEDIUM: XSS - Error message injection
|
|
File: webserver.py (lines 1258-1267, 2075-2084, 2030-2039)
|
|
Impact: JavaScript execution through error messages
|
|
Description: Error messages containing user data not escaped
|
|
Recommendation: Escape all error message content
|
|
|
|
15. MEDIUM: Missing rate limiting
|
|
File: webserver.py (entire file)
|
|
Impact: Brute force attacks, DoS
|
|
Description: No rate limiting on any endpoints
|
|
Recommendation: Implement rate limiting especially for PIN verification
|
|
|
|
16. MEDIUM: Insecure session management
|
|
File: webserver.py (entire file)
|
|
Impact: Session attacks, CSRF
|
|
Description: No session tokens, CSRF protection, or timeouts
|
|
Recommendation: Implement proper session management
|
|
|
|
17. MEDIUM: SQL injection in backup manager
|
|
File: backup_manager.py (lines 349, 353)
|
|
Impact: Potential SQL execution
|
|
Description: F-string usage with table names from sqlite_master
|
|
Recommendation: Use proper SQL escaping for dynamic table names
|
|
|
|
18. MEDIUM: PIN system vulnerabilities
|
|
File: team_builder.py, database.py
|
|
Impact: Unauthorized team changes
|
|
Description: PIN delivery via IRC without additional verification
|
|
Recommendation: Enhance PIN system with additional verification
|
|
|
|
19. MEDIUM: Missing access controls
|
|
File: webserver.py (lines 584-588)
|
|
Impact: Unauthorized profile access
|
|
Description: Team builder accessible by anyone
|
|
Recommendation: Implement access control for team builders
|
|
|
|
20. MEDIUM: Debug information exposure
|
|
File: webserver.py (line 2766)
|
|
Impact: Information disclosure
|
|
Description: Extensive console logging exposes internals
|
|
Recommendation: Implement proper logging levels
|
|
|
|
LOW SEVERITY VULNERABILITIES (3 issues)
|
|
=======================================
|
|
|
|
21. LOW: Server binds to all interfaces
|
|
File: webserver.py (line 4773)
|
|
Impact: Increased attack surface
|
|
Description: Server accessible from all network interfaces
|
|
Recommendation: Bind to specific interface if possible
|
|
|
|
22. LOW: No request size limits
|
|
File: webserver.py (entire file)
|
|
Impact: DoS attacks
|
|
Description: No limits on request size or JSON payload
|
|
Recommendation: Implement request size limits
|
|
|
|
23. LOW: Missing security monitoring
|
|
File: webserver.py (entire file)
|
|
Impact: Limited attack detection
|
|
Description: No access logging or security monitoring
|
|
Recommendation: Implement comprehensive security logging
|
|
|
|
REMEDIATION PRIORITIES
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
IMMEDIATE (Critical Issues):
|
|
1. Fix XSS vulnerabilities by implementing HTML escaping
|
|
2. Add HTTP security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.)
|
|
3. Implement HTTPS with valid SSL certificates
|
|
4. Add basic authentication for web interface
|
|
5. Fix path traversal vulnerabilities
|
|
|
|
HIGH PRIORITY (Within 1 week):
|
|
1. Implement input validation and sanitization
|
|
2. Fix SQL injection vulnerabilities
|
|
3. Enhance admin authentication system
|
|
4. Add rate limiting for all endpoints
|
|
5. Improve error handling to prevent information disclosure
|
|
|
|
MEDIUM PRIORITY (Within 1 month):
|
|
1. Implement proper session management
|
|
2. Add CSRF protection
|
|
3. Enhance PIN verification system
|
|
4. Implement access controls for all resources
|
|
5. Add security logging and monitoring
|
|
|
|
LOW PRIORITY (Within 3 months):
|
|
1. Network security hardening
|
|
2. Request size limits
|
|
3. Advanced security monitoring
|
|
4. Security testing automation
|
|
5. Security documentation updates
|
|
|
|
SECURITY TESTING RECOMMENDATIONS
|
|
================================
|
|
|
|
1. Automated vulnerability scanning
|
|
2. Penetration testing by security professionals
|
|
3. Code review by security experts
|
|
4. Input fuzzing tests
|
|
5. Authentication bypass testing
|
|
6. Session management testing
|
|
7. SQL injection testing
|
|
8. XSS testing with various payloads
|
|
9. CSRF testing
|
|
10. Rate limiting testing
|
|
|
|
POSITIVE SECURITY PRACTICES FOUND
|
|
=================================
|
|
|
|
1. Consistent use of parameterized SQL queries (prevents SQL injection)
|
|
2. PIN verification system uses cryptographically secure random generation
|
|
3. Database queries properly use ? placeholders for user input
|
|
4. No dangerous functions like eval() or exec() found
|
|
5. No system command execution with user input
|
|
6. JSON parsing includes proper error handling
|
|
7. Input normalization implemented in base module
|
|
8. PIN expiration mechanism (10 minutes) implemented
|
|
9. Single-use PIN system prevents replay attacks
|
|
10. Proper database transaction handling in critical operations
|
|
|
|
TECHNICAL DEBT CONSIDERATIONS
|
|
============================
|
|
|
|
1. Implement proper templating engine with auto-escaping
|
|
2. Add web application firewall (WAF)
|
|
3. Implement Content Security Policy (CSP)
|
|
4. Add security headers middleware
|
|
5. Implement proper logging framework
|
|
6. Add security unit tests
|
|
7. Implement secure configuration management
|
|
8. Add API rate limiting
|
|
9. Implement proper error handling framework
|
|
10. Add security monitoring and alerting
|
|
|
|
COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS
|
|
========================
|
|
|
|
1. Data protection: Player data is publicly accessible
|
|
2. Access control: No authorization mechanism
|
|
3. Encryption: No HTTPS implementation
|
|
4. Logging: No security audit logs
|
|
5. Authentication: No proper user authentication
|
|
|
|
CONCLUSION
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
The PetBot application has significant security vulnerabilities that should be addressed before production deployment. The most critical issues are XSS vulnerabilities and missing authentication controls. However, the application demonstrates good security practices in database operations and PIN generation.
|
|
|
|
Priority should be given to:
|
|
1. Implementing proper input validation and output escaping
|
|
2. Adding authentication and authorization mechanisms
|
|
3. Securing the web interface with HTTPS and security headers
|
|
4. Implementing rate limiting and session management
|
|
|
|
The development team should establish security practices including:
|
|
- Security code reviews
|
|
- Automated vulnerability scanning
|
|
- Regular security testing
|
|
- Security training for developers
|
|
- Incident response procedures
|
|
|
|
This audit provides a comprehensive foundation for improving the security posture of the PetBot application. |